“What is a referendum?” asked my little sister, on which a friend of ours replied “when the government ask you to choose black or white”. This same black/white question was asked by Erdoğan, the current president of Turkey. He asked all those with a Turkish identity (in- and outside of Turkey) to vote. A YES-vote would give him more power and change the current republic system into a presidential one. A NO-vote means that you are against these changes and want the political institution to stay like it was before. What I’d like to do today, is analyzing the propaganda used by the current government. This propaganda was meant to make the Turkish people aware of the referendum and their ability to vote.
Months before the actual referendum people everywhere were talking about it. In the Belgian journals it was presented as something very bad and in the Turkish journals as something incredibly good. In Turkey the YES-camp hang big posters to show their contribution. The posters are mainly found nearby the roads, where almost no NO-poster was to be seen (actually there were almost no NO-posters to be seen anywhere else either). If already a NO-poster hang, it would usually be quite small or would be located next to another bigger YES-poster. Protests against the referendum were banished and Turkish citizens outing their NO-opinion would be rare. Maybe because there is a scare of loosing one’s job, go to prison or have family members to get in trouble? By the way, the YES-camp was referring to everybody who would vote NO to be “Gülenists”, “terrorists”, “the ones who want to make a coup”, “PKK supporters”…
After the votes had been counted, it looked like Turkey was split into two parts since the result almost reached 50-50. The eventual results being 48,59 – 51,41 % weighted more on the YES-camp (1.379.934 more votes for YES were counted) and so Erdoğan won. This is something what most of Turkish people expected to happen from the beginning on. I’d like to analyze these results too. Multiple video’s have been posted online showing that some Turkish citizens made extra YES-votes (so there would be more votes than people who actually voted). Some Turkish people didn’t use their votes; they thought that it wouldn’t make a difference, they didn’t want to decide, they would be students… Students mostly out themselves as NO-voters. Since most of them study in a city far away from their hometown, where the vote had to be taken, not all of them could come to vote. They either have tests that week or don’t have the money to travel. They claim that there was no other option to make your vote count than go vote yourself.
Many Turkish people now say that Turkey died because of this referendum. They mean that this “new Turkey” is not anymore the Turkey that their founder, Atatürk, created. Meanwhile, in Belgium, 77% out of the votes went to the YES-camp (with 40% of the Turks not using their votes). This is the country with the highest YES-score. Even in the cities where most of them come from: Emirdağ (in Afyon) and in Konya more Turkish citizens voted NO. In Emirdağ only 57,79% said YES, in Konya 72,88%.
I’d like every one who reads this or is interested in this referendum to think about the following:
– Would the votes be different if the NO-camp was allowed to make there voice heard and hang posters as much as the YES-camp could?
– Would it make a difference if all Turkish citizens would have been able to vote (inclusive Kurds who don’t own a Turkish identity, the students who couldn’t go use their vote…)?
– Is it okay to make such a big decision happen if almost half of the citizens are against it?
– What impact did the Turkish people outside of Turkey have on the referendum and what do the Turkish citizens themselves think about this?
(some of these questions are easy to answer for one person, but wouldn’t make sense to another)
Thank you for reading!
Clara